Every now and again, and against my better judgement as I'm very aware of "feeding the trolls", I engage with those who make comments on some of my posts. Recently, I've had an amicable exchange with someone, quite young, who claims that they hate both socialists and socialism. I'm not too sure that they really know what they are talking about so I thought, with all due respect, that I'd challenge their views - assuming that they still read what I write. So this is for them (Anon from the UK).............and any others who may have lost sight of the benefits of socialist policies. And which could be lost if we drift to the right. And for what?
You've told me how much you hate socialism and
socialists and I really hope you’re not being hypocritical about it. If
you truly hate socialism, you’d better not be benefitting from public ownership
or accepting any of the rights that were won for you through the sacrifices of
our socialist forefathers. Here are a few things that you might like to ponder on.
Public
health: If
you or your family have ever used the NHS for anything from injury and illness
to pregnancy and childbirth, you’ve benefitted from socialised public
health. If you truly hate socialism, you should want to pay
profits to capitalist profiteers every time you visit a doctor, and detest the
lefty idea of "free at the point of need". Am I correct?
Paid holidays: If
you’ve ever had paid holidays at work, you’ve benefitted from the workers’
rights won for you by generations of socialists. If you
truly hate socialism, you should reject the advancements that our socialist
forefathers fought for, and always refuse paid leave. But I expect you already do this without any prompting from me.
The
weekend: A
lot of people take the idea of the five day working week and the eight hour
working day for granted, but they were actually won for us by socialist
activism. If you enjoy your weekends, and protections from
bosses trying to force you to work insanely long hours, you’re benefitting from
socialism. Pretty good, eh?
Employment
rights: Do
you think bosses should be able to fire their workers whenever they like and for
whatever reason? Like Elon Musk is doing right now in the USA?
* If they don’t like you advocating for safe
working conditions, or if they’re a frothing bigot who wants to get rid of you because
of your race, religion, or sexuality?
* If they want to use
their position of power to punish you for your political
opinions?
* If they want to fire you and hire someone who will
do your job for a much lower salary?
Well,
if you hate socialism, you should want a bonfire of employment rights so that
capitalists can bully, exploit, and dispose of their workers as they see fit. And you won't complain if any of these things happen to you and yours.
Pensions: You’d
better not be planning to accept your state pension when you retire, because
that’s a socialised benefit. You should be wanting to work
until you drop dead, or get killed by the insane hours and unsafe work
conditions that your pesky socialist forefathers fought to eliminate,
right?
Social
security: If
you properly hate socialism, you’d better not have ever accepted money from the
social security system. No statutory sick pay; no child
benefits; no tax credits or housing benefit when your employer paid you
exploitative poverty wages; no automatic National Insurance contributions when
you were studying or raising children; and no unemployment support if your employer
ever unexpectedly laid you off.All of these advantages and
protections from destitution were won by socialists, so if you properly hate
socialism you should have been rejecting them all, and uncomplainingly suffering destitution in your times of need.
Culture
and public arts: You
do realise that a huge proportion of museums, art galleries, music venues,
theatres, town and village halls, community centres, and cultural events are
supported by public funds? If you’re opposed to
socialising the cost of these things, you should be distancing yourself from most of Britain’s
cultural life, shouldn't you?
Universal
education: 93%
of us went to state schools, so it’s highly likely that you benefitted from
socialised education. Even if your parents were loaded enough to send you to
private school, you still benefit indirectly from the fact that your doctor,
accountant, plumber, train driver, sales assistant et al have literacy and
numeracy.
If you truly believed in capitalistic
exploitation, surely you think all parents should pay capitalists to educate their children? And then the children of the poor and ordinary should have to learn to
live without literacy and numeracy because their parents can’t afford the
ever-inflating education fees that are required to cover the cost of capitalist
profits?
Roads: If
you hate the idea of public ownership, you’d better not be freeloading by using
Britain’s road network. You should want the roads to be
privatised, so that you can pay tolls to the capitalist operators every time you
step foot outside your door.
The
armed forces: If
you hate socialism, have you ever asked yourself why the Armed Forces aren’t
privatised? I mean, defence of the nation seems like an
extremely important thing, and if the right-wingers are correct about capitalism
being inherently more efficient than public ownership, it seems extremely odd
that they’ve left the Army, Navy, and Air Force under public control. In fact, if public ownership is so inherently
inefficient, how come the government uses the Police and Army to step in at the
last minute and save the day when capitalists totally screw things up, like
security at the 2012 Olympics?
National parks
and public spaces: I’m a big fan of Britain’s national
parks and public spaces, but they must make you furious. You must boil with rage that huge swathes of the
countryside are publicly owned, or protected by public legislation. Just think
of revenue capitalists are losing because they’re prevented from concreting over
our national parks?
A lot of people think that one of the things that
makes British cities so great is that we have so many public parks compared to a
lot of other countries. As a self-declared hater of public ownership, you must
be enraged that capitalist profiteers are cruelly prevented from buying up and
building over all of this prime building land.
Privatisation: I’m
with the majority of British people who think that privatisation of essential
infrastructure and services like energy, water, and the railways have been
disastrous for British people and the British economy.
As
a hater of socialism you should be ecstatic every time you receive extortionate
energy bills; see privatised water companies inflating their profits by pumping
raw sewage into our rivers and coastal waters instead of treating it; or have to
suffer our creaking, unreliable, over-crowded, and over-priced rail
network.
You must be delighted at the billions of pounds that have been soaked out of our economy by the privatisation profiteers, after
they were given all of this stuff at a fraction of its true
value. And you must seeth with rage at the popular idea that
these essential things should be renationalised and run for the benefit of the
British people and the British economy, not for capitalist
profiteering.
Anti-Britishness: It’s
interesting that right-wingers of your ilk promote privatisation by claiming that public
ownership is inherently inefficient, but then have no objection whatsoever
when foreign governments buy up massive stakes in our "privatised"
essential infrastructure and services. It seems
that people like you only hate public ownership when it’s British public
ownership, but you’re absolutely cool with it when the government of France buys
up all of our nuclear power stations for example, and when countries like Qatar
and China buy up chunks of our privatised water companies and national
grid.
It would be less hypocritical if you could be honest about it and admit that you just hate the idea of British people benefitting from
socialised ownership of British infrastructure and services, but that you are fine with the people of France, China and Qatar reaping the benefits through their government's ownership of our stuff."Other
people’s money": But socialism is just "spending
other people’s money" you like to squeal, but then you seem to be
forgetting how your beloved capitalists are completely addicted to public
cash. Fossil fuel and arms companies receive literally trillions of pounds in public subsidies every year
globally. When capitalism fails they always go crying to
the government for bailouts, like what happened after the reckless UK financial
sector gambled themselves into insolvency in 2008.When
capitalist employers boost their profits by paying their workers unliveable
poverty wages, they rely on public funds to lift their workers out of
destitution via in-work benefits that cost tens of billions of pound in public funds per
year.
Why are you OK with governments endlessly
subsidising and bailing out greedy capitalist profiteers, but go apoplectic with rage
at the idea of public funds being spent to improve the lives of yourself and
your fellow Brits?
"Idle
layabouts": Who told you that socialism exists to pay for
the lifestyles of idle layabouts? Socialism exists to ensure
workers get a fair deal, and to keep the most vital components of the national
economy (health, education, water, energy, transport, mail …) out of the hands
of greedy capitalist privatisation profiteers.
If you want
to oppose an ideology that supports the lifestyles of idle layabouts, maybe you
should have a think about how capitalism actually works? Who
are really the idle layabouts? The socialists calling for better wages and
working conditions for British workers? Or the capitalist shareholders passively
collecting lavish dividends on the national infrastructure that was sold off to
them at a tiny fraction of its true
value?
Who told you to hate
socialism?: Maybe it would be helpful to consider how you
came to believe that socialism is such a terrible thing?
Did
you read it in a capitalist newspaper? See it on a capitalist TV station? Get
fed it by the algorithm of a capitalist social media platform? Hear it from a
capitalist-bankrolled politician or someone who idly profiteers from shares in
what used to be our publicly owned stuff? Get told it through one of the dodgy
opaquely-funded right-wing think tanks whose paid propagandists are virtually
ubiquitous on TV politics shows these days? Perhaps
it’s time to have a think about why capitalists are prepared to spend such vast
fortunes trying to convince ordinary people that socialism is a terrible thing,
even though ordinary people would be even worse off than they already are
without socialist protections and public provision? Perhaps it’s time to think about what right wing policies actually mean for you and your family?