A quick trip to Cotehele House to see what's on display for Daffodil Week. Mmmm, daffodils, that's what.
Quid me anxius sum? (Alfred E Neuman, Mad Magazine circa 1956). Facio, ita.
Sunday, 17 March 2024
Friday, 15 March 2024
Aneurin Bevan: telling it the way it should be
If, like me, you are seeking relief from the pantomime that now passes as politics, I can thoroughly recommend a 'grown up' book on the subject: Aneurin Bevan's In Place of Fear.
First published in 1952, In Place of Fear serves as an inspiring insight into the political philosophy of Aneurin Bevan. Most famously Minister for Health and Housing in the post-World War II British Labour government, Bevan established the National Health Service (NHS). From what was previously a piecemeal coverage dependent on charities, employers, and private clinicians. emerged universal healthcare (while still having charities, private clinicians, etc. lurking around the edges). The vital difference was that, for the first time in Britain, medical care was available on demand and free at the point of use for all. It was one of the most (positively) transformative moments in the nation’s history. It was Bevan's unshakeable credo that "the collective principle asserts that no society can legitimately call itself civilised if a sick person is denied medical aid because of lack of means".
Growing up in the hardship of a South Wales mining community (Tredegar), Bevan developed a passionate conviction in the need for collective action by his class. In 1929 he began his long career as the Member for Ebbw Vale, and developed into one of the most brilliant debaters in Parliament. He believed that Democracy and Socialism go hand in hand and that the unrestrained free-market undermines democracy. Rather than an economy based on the attempt to frighten people into working harder by allowing many to fall into unemployment, poverty and homelessness pour encourager des autres, Bevan proposed that government provides for the basic needs of all through a comprehensive welfare system and more control of the nation's resources and infrastructure. Although written in the early 1950s, it is as relevant today as it was when it first came out. It's a programme of social democracy that the Labour party and Keir Starmer have long left behind. It hits all the spots that they miss by a mile. And that's a shame. It's also a shame that no political leader today, no matter what the party, seems to be able to articulate their guiding principles as clearly and cogently as Aneurin Bevan. We need his like now - but where are they?
Thursday, 14 March 2024
Hoyle vs Abbott
Prime Minister's Questions this week turned into even more of a farce than usual as the Speaker Lindsay Hoyle repeatedly ignored Diane Abbott as she rose 46 times to try and get a word in about the racist abuse and incitement to kill her from the Tory party’s biggest donor Frank Hester. A significant portion of PMQs was dedicated to these violent and abusive comments but Hoyle decided not to let the victim speak, instead leaving it to others to discuss the issue on her behalf.
Rishi Sunak made out that the whole issue should be forgiven and forgotten because the perpetrator had "apologised". There are several things wrong with this:
1. It's not Sunak's decision whether to accept an apology or not. Isn't that for Diane Abbott to decide?
2. Anyway, it's a hell of a stretch to portray Hester's statement about his scandalous comments an "apology". It was more of a defensive and self-serving PR exercise in responsibility evasion than an apology. And it didn't even address the main issue that he’d called for an MP to be killed!
3. And then there's the fact that any ordinary person who hasn’t donated £10 million to the Tory party would never be instantly absolved upon a mealy-mouthed "apology for causing offense" if they'd spewed racist abuse at an MP and called for them to be shot. They'd be the subject of near-universal condemnation and a likely criminal investigation.
Watching Keir Starmer using the scandal to score political points was certainly not edifying. We know that his faction of the Labour Party is keeping Diane Abbott suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party with the intention of booting her out of her constituency at the looming general election. And we know that they did absolutely nothing to punish the Labour insiders who bullied Diane Abbott and heaped dreadful racist abuse upon her. All of this was clearly referenced in the highly critical Forde Report which Starmer continues to outright ignore. (In July 2022, Martin Forde KC produced a report on racism and factionalism in the Labour Party. The report had been commissioned by the party leader himself).
It’s nauseating that Hoyle allowed such an obscene spectacle to play
out without allowing the victim of the abuse and threats to get a word in as
Sunak and Starmer used the scandal to push their own agendas and point score at
each other. The excuses Hoyle’s office came up with afterwards are downright ridiculous. They claimed that there wasn’t enough time to allow Diane Abbott to speak! However the session ended at 12:35, and, as has been pointed out by others, the previous
two PMQs went on until 12:39 and 12:43. Surely 8 minutes would have been enough time for a question and a response, and
even if it had taken ten minutes, what would have been the harm if the session
had gone on until quarter to one? The excuse that they "ran out of time" simply does not add up.
Hoyle’s decision denied Diane Abbott the opportunity to speak and prevented her
from highlighting her continued suspension from the Parliamentary Labour Party,
and the history of horrific racism and bullying she suffered at the hands of
Labour Party insiders.
In the space of just a few weeks, Hoyle has gone from binning parliamentary
procedure citing threats and abuse of MPs, to citing parliamentary procedure as
an excuse for not allowing the victim of threats and abuse to speak! It’s impossible to look at
a person making absolutely polar opposite justifications for his biased and
outrageous decisions and think that he’s remotely fit to continue doing such an
important job. Time for him to go.
Friday, 8 March 2024
A walk around St Cleer
Hooray, a day with no forecasted rain - a long awaited first. Our choice of route was one that we last did some 14 years ago. We enjoyed it then and we enjoyed it again. As ever, a short record of a very good day's walking.
About 1/2 mile into the walk and looking back towards St Cleer church. The last time we did this route, about 12 years ago, we saw some deer just about here. None today |
This is where we should have walked but, as we didn't fancy getting up to our knees in mud, we made a diversion around this patch. It's always wet so the diversion was well used |
This stream doesn't seem to have a name and we walked along various stretches of it. It was obvious that, every now and again, it had been used to power various mills. |
Mossy Tree #1: seemed to be a recurrent theme on this walk |
The anonymous stream (again) as it passes through the woods of Bulland Downs |
Mossy Tree #2: given the many shoots, I suspect that we are looking at the remnants of past coppicing activities |
The track leading downhill from King Doniert's Stone. It's not quite as I remember it. There's something missing............ |
........and here it is. Water. The path soon turns into a stream as water is channeled off the fields. Nothing quite like sloshing along a watercourse. Dog Dora seems to be enjoying it as well |
This nicely carved pulpit, the work of Harry Hems, dates only from 1895. He was an ecclesiastical sculptor who was particularly inspired by Gothic architecture and a practitioner of Gothic Revival. He founded and ran a large workshop in Exeter, which produced woodwork and sculpture for churches all over the country |
Tuesday, 5 March 2024
It's getting more and more difficult to get to the truth
Unfortunately for we Labour supporters, Keir Starmer is not without form. By his own actions since, he's shown that he lied his way into the Labour
leadership with a load of pledges, policies, and promises that he never
intended to keep. He lies when he says that he never said that Israel has the
right to collectively punish civilians by cutting off food, water, and
energy; and he lies that his so-called "patriotic economy"
is going to bring back prosperity for ordinary people when it’s actually just
another dose of the same austerity agenda that’s been trashing
living standards for the last 14 years.
Instead of holding these political liars to account, Britain’s supine political media class have knowingly amplified and obfuscated the lies of
their favoured factions. If you read the Telegraph, Sun, or Daily Mail or watch GB News, you’d never know that Sunak and his Tory mob are such a pack of liars. And if you uncritically read what the Guardian tells you, you’d
probably believe that Starmer actually did a great thing by lying to the
Labour membership to get the party leadership, or that he had to abandon
all his promises because of circumstances, rather than because he never
intended to actually keep them.
But social media is even worse. Not only is it infested with all the establishment lies, our social media feeds are increasingly plagued with fakery, scams, AI-generated dross, woe-peddlers and conspiracy theory rubbish. Social media platforms like Facebook don’t just allow lies to flourish on their platforms, they make absolute fortunes actively helping the liars to spread their lies.
So if politics, the media, and social media are so infested with lies, where can we seek the truth? It’s an extremely difficult question to answer. I wish I had one. I struggle to find News that is truthful and unbiased.
There’s still a small minority of decent politicians and journalists among all the professional liars. I’d be much more inclined to take the Green Party's Caroline Lucas, independent North East mayoral candidate Jamie Driscoll, Hilary Benn or Manchester mayor Andy Burnham at their word than most politicians. I don’t necessarily agree with everything they say, but the journalism of Peter Oborne, Owen Jones, James O'Brian and George Monbiot is infinitely more believable than the output of the majority of journalists who seem to see it as their job to amplify establishment lies rather than call them out.
There are actually quite a lot of reliable sources on social media, but they’re increasingly difficult to find since platforms like Facebook and Xitter changed their engagement algorithms to deprioritise independent media accounts.
The best advice I can offer is to engage your critical faculties at all times. Remember that we’re all wading through a sickening morass of propaganda, bullshit, and lies, and that the truth-tellers are increasingly difficult to find. In the end, I think that the answer lies with us. Me and You. Every time we receive a WhatsApp or a Facebook post or whatever, we have to question whether it is true or untrue. Don’t take it for granted. We must reply to those spreading untruths. The same for those in power. Question their “facts” and don’t let them repeat untruths again and again. And definitely don't forward anything to your friends if you have not validated it first.
If you come across any politicians, political writers, or independent media sources that do seem to be doing their best to stick to the truth, treasure them. But don’t just passively follow them, because the social media algorithms simply can’t be trusted to actually show you their content. Actively seek them out and see what they’re saying.
Look out for red flags. If anyone tries to tell you that "wealth trickles down", presents austerity economics as a way to bring back prosperity, or compares government borrowing to credit card debt, they’re liars who are spreading economic illiteracy, either because they’re too dumb to realise they’re spreading economic lies, or because they’re cynically lying on purpose to dupe the gullible. If anyone tries to portray overwhelmingly peaceful Palestine solidarity campaigners as a dangerous and violent mob, you know they’re a reality-reverser who cannot be trusted. If you see journalists and media outlets amplifying or obfuscating political lies rather than calling them out, remember it, and don’t trust them in future.
There’s no perfect source that’s going to tell you the truth on every issue. But there are those that cite their evidence, try to do their best to be truthful, and apologise on the occasions they make factual errors rather than doubling-down or pretending it never happened. They’re the ones to follow and support. Free Speech is a precious thing and something we should never take for granted. However, I think that the Freedom to speak should be backed up with the necessity to prove your facts.
If you know of any politicians/sources you consider to be broadly honest and reliable, I'd love to hear of them. And for those interested, here are some of my own sources.
- The Guardian
- The Observer
- The Internationalist
- Private Eye
- The New Statesman
- New York Times
- Peace News
- Bloomberg
- Politico (Good for Polls)
- UK-ICE (Interesting articles)
- Vox
- BBC
- Google News (Surprisingly good)
- Amnesty International
- Liberty
- The Violence of Development website (for the politics of Central America)
Sunday, 3 March 2024
Rilla Mill and Henwood - without too much rain
Guess what? The weather forecast was wrong and we had a day with hardly any rain. Not no rain, just not as much as expected. Hardly anything in fact. Another good stretch of the legs.
A panoramic view as we leave Rilla Mill. Kit Hill is the bump in the distance and, for one fleeting moment, the sky has a few blue patches |
A muddy track at the start of the Marke Valley. This would, undoubtedly, have been used to access the mines |
I don't know who was more surprised, me or them? Not what I expected to come across whilst sloshing up the track |
It may be muddy, it may be wet but the air is fresh and clean. Lots of Spanish Moss hanging from the trees is a good indication of a pure atmosphere |
Some of the buildings associated with the Phoenix United Mines. That on the left housed two rather large boilers at one time. But, this time around, we didn't explore further as lunch beckoned |
A verdant track dropping back towards the Phoenix mine. A lovely wall of moss covered stones on the left - a very vibrant green |
If you have plenty of granite to hand, why not use it to block up an old field entrance. In this particular case, I think the uprights were 'repurposed' from an adjacent dilapidated barn |
Mmmm, this is what I call a proper puddle! Requiring a little deft climbing along the bank on the left |
Just a very pleasant pastoral view, looking across to Kit Hill in the distance. It's probably 10 miles from here to our house which, with binoculars, we could probably make out |
Not the sort of road sign that we normally see in these parts. They appear on the lanes around the Lower Lake Shooting Grounds - clay pigeon shooting rather than anything more objectionable |
And let's finish with the sound of running water.