As a follow on, it's interesting to read that Oxfam has recently challenged the World’s political leaders, gathered at this week’s World Economic Forum in
The key points Oxfam makes are:
* The world must urgently set goals to tackle extreme inequality and extreme wealth.
* Extreme wealth and inequality are reaching levels never before seen and are getting worse.
* Extreme wealth and inequality are economically inefficient.
* Extreme wealth and inequality are politically corrosive.
* Extreme wealth and inequality are socially divisive.
* Extreme wealth and inequality are environmentally destructive.
* Extreme wealth and inequality are unethical.
* Extreme wealth and inequality are not inevitable.
Each point is supported with some evidence (nothing too weighty as it's a very short report -just under 4 pages) and the conclusion is: "we cannot afford to have a world of extreme wealth and extreme inequality. We cannot afford to have a world where inequality continues to grow in the majority of countries. In a world of increasingly scarce resources, reducing inequality is more important than ever. It needs to be reduced and quickly".
All very laudable and a philosophy I agree with. I am, however, underwhelmed by this stated objective: "that is why we are calling for a new global goal to end extreme wealth by 2025 and reverse the rapid increase in inequality seen in the majority of countries in the last twenty years, taking inequality back to 1990 levels". Calling for a return to the poverty level of a previous decade strikes me as rather self-defeating for a organisation that claims to want to eliminate it. After all, 1990 was not a year when the star of equality shone brightly in the sky.